Comments on: why not flash? http://www.davegreenwood.com/weblog/archives/13 displaying my photographs... Mon, 06 Sep 2010 06:00:11 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Michel http://www.davegreenwood.com/weblog/archives/13#comment-378 Michel Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:57:13 +0000 http://davegreenwood.com/weblog/2007/02/08/why-not-flash/#comment-378 I don't like Flash, either:) You cannot send a link to a specific photo to a friend, for example. Plain ol' HTML, CSS and images are best for showing one's photography -- or so I believe... :) (First time, btw, I enjoyed a lot of your photos in /zenphoto :) Cheers! I don’t like Flash, either:)

You cannot send a link to a specific photo to a friend, for example. Plain ol’ HTML, CSS and images are best for showing one’s photography — or so I believe… :)

(First time, btw, I enjoyed a lot of your photos in /zenphoto :)

Cheers!

]]> By: Tas http://www.davegreenwood.com/weblog/archives/13#comment-7 Tas Sat, 10 Feb 2007 20:49:37 +0000 http://davegreenwood.com/weblog/2007/02/08/why-not-flash/#comment-7 I know what you're saying re bookmarks. I use a simple screen capture program to grab images from flash sites. I know what you’re saying re bookmarks. I use a simple screen capture program to grab images from flash sites.

]]> By: harrycw http://www.davegreenwood.com/weblog/archives/13#comment-5 harrycw Fri, 09 Feb 2007 13:40:09 +0000 http://davegreenwood.com/weblog/2007/02/08/why-not-flash/#comment-5 Hi Dave, I agree...I've never been fond of Flash for viewing photographs as I feel that it's not really a stills photography medium. It appears somehow to be less in one's control when compared to html based sites. Also the bookmarks point is crucial. I mark alot of pictures using bookmarks and can't do that individually with flash. Also I think that as a viewer you are aware of the embedded quality of a photograph within flash...and I don't like that. Nice mate... H Hi Dave,
I agree…I’ve never been fond of Flash for viewing photographs as I feel that it’s not really a stills photography medium. It appears somehow to be less in one’s control when compared to html based sites. Also the bookmarks point is crucial. I mark alot of pictures using bookmarks and can’t do that individually with flash. Also I think that as a viewer you are aware of the embedded quality of a photograph within flash…and I don’t like that.
Nice mate…
H

]]>